<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Don&#8217;t You Comment @Mashable?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.livecrunch.com/2008/09/17/why-dont-you-comment-mashable/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.livecrunch.com/2008/09/17/why-dont-you-comment-mashable/</link>
	<description>Your Daily Techology News, Tutorials and How To&#039;s</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 10:29:48 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: live crunch</title>
		<link>http://www.livecrunch.com/2008/09/17/why-dont-you-comment-mashable/comment-page-1/#comment-20350</link>
		<dc:creator>live crunch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 11:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livecrunch.com/?p=956#comment-20350</guid>
		<description>@app: I would comment on Gizmodo!  No just kidding!

Kittyhell.com :)

Thanks for your input</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@app: I would comment on Gizmodo!  No just kidding!</p>
<p>Kittyhell.com <img src='http://www.livecrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Thanks for your input</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: app</title>
		<link>http://www.livecrunch.com/2008/09/17/why-dont-you-comment-mashable/comment-page-1/#comment-20344</link>
		<dc:creator>app</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 08:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livecrunch.com/?p=956#comment-20344</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t misunderstand my feelings on captchas...I don&#039;t mind them and I understand their purpose. What I mind are ones that don&#039;t work and suck my comments into a black hole. There are some buggy ones out there that hate me (or my browser).

As far as what I meant about being human and having some thoughts &amp; feelings to share, I wasn&#039;t really referring to being conversational like ProBlogger.

 I&#039;ll give you this as a technology example:

Remember when every site was reporting on the Hello Kitty antivirus?

Which of the following posts seems like it was written by a human and which looks like it was made by some sort of mindless bot?

http://www.kittyhell.com/2008/07/03/hello-kitty-antivirus-and-firewall-software/
http://gizmodo.com/5022172/found-in-china-hello-kitty-antivirus-and-firewall-software

Which of those posts would YOU comment on, based purely on the post&#039;s content?

This blogger did a much better job than Gizmodo did:  http://www.popgadget.net/2008/07/hello_kitty_ant.php

And after all your readers have seen those, and millions similar to the Gizmodo one, what is left to post about it, without seeming repetitive, boring, and unoriginal?

How about this? http://cranialsoup.blogspot.com/2008/08/barbie-wants-to-code.html

Lots of ways to present the same content, without being anywhere near the same, by just adding your own thoughts &amp; feelings, and even if people have heard about it already, your post can still be worth paying attention to and commenting on. And plenty of ways to seem more human than road signs like Gizmodo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t misunderstand my feelings on captchas&#8230;I don&#8217;t mind them and I understand their purpose. What I mind are ones that don&#8217;t work and suck my comments into a black hole. There are some buggy ones out there that hate me (or my browser).</p>
<p>As far as what I meant about being human and having some thoughts &amp; feelings to share, I wasn&#8217;t really referring to being conversational like ProBlogger.</p>
<p> I&#8217;ll give you this as a technology example:</p>
<p>Remember when every site was reporting on the Hello Kitty antivirus?</p>
<p>Which of the following posts seems like it was written by a human and which looks like it was made by some sort of mindless bot?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.kittyhell.com/2008/07/03/hello-kitty-antivirus-and-firewall-software/" rel="nofollow">http://www.kittyhell.com/2008/07/03/hello-kitty-antivirus-and-firewall-software/</a><br />
<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5022172/found-in-china-hello-kitty-antivirus-and-firewall-software" rel="nofollow">http://gizmodo.com/5022172/found-in-china-hello-kitty-antivirus-and-firewall-software</a></p>
<p>Which of those posts would YOU comment on, based purely on the post&#8217;s content?</p>
<p>This blogger did a much better job than Gizmodo did:  <a href="http://www.popgadget.net/2008/07/hello_kitty_ant.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.popgadget.net/2008/07/hello_kitty_ant.php</a></p>
<p>And after all your readers have seen those, and millions similar to the Gizmodo one, what is left to post about it, without seeming repetitive, boring, and unoriginal?</p>
<p>How about this? <a href="http://cranialsoup.blogspot.com/2008/08/barbie-wants-to-code.html" rel="nofollow">http://cranialsoup.blogspot.com/2008/08/barbie-wants-to-code.html</a></p>
<p>Lots of ways to present the same content, without being anywhere near the same, by just adding your own thoughts &amp; feelings, and even if people have heard about it already, your post can still be worth paying attention to and commenting on. And plenty of ways to seem more human than road signs like Gizmodo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug (a.k.a Shotokan)</title>
		<link>http://www.livecrunch.com/2008/09/17/why-dont-you-comment-mashable/comment-page-1/#comment-20330</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug (a.k.a Shotokan)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 02:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livecrunch.com/?p=956#comment-20330</guid>
		<description>Unless I feel very strong about a post, I won&#039;t comment.  Just like good content draws me in to read it, the comments need to draw me in and make me what to respond to them and carry on a dialog.

Also, knowing the person who wrote the post, from the various social networks, can make me want to comment just like I am doing here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unless I feel very strong about a post, I won&#8217;t comment.  Just like good content draws me in to read it, the comments need to draw me in and make me what to respond to them and carry on a dialog.</p>
<p>Also, knowing the person who wrote the post, from the various social networks, can make me want to comment just like I am doing here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: live crunch</title>
		<link>http://www.livecrunch.com/2008/09/17/why-dont-you-comment-mashable/comment-page-1/#comment-20319</link>
		<dc:creator>live crunch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 21:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livecrunch.com/?p=956#comment-20319</guid>
		<description>@Neal ?thePuck? Jansons: What do you mean it goes down hill?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Neal ?thePuck? Jansons: What do you mean it goes down hill?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: live crunch</title>
		<link>http://www.livecrunch.com/2008/09/17/why-dont-you-comment-mashable/comment-page-1/#comment-20318</link>
		<dc:creator>live crunch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 21:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livecrunch.com/?p=956#comment-20318</guid>
		<description>@app: I totally agree with you App. Thing is that capcha is used for spam commentators yet the once they want you to login I am there with  you. Why would I have to login, go to my email, click on activation key , login again , search for the post I originaly wanted to comment on....

Anyways I do tend to reply to every single comment, yet I do admit that I don&#039;t make conversational posts as for example Problogger.net does. Technology now days you know for your self that it changes every minute if not second, what you knew minute ago it&#039;s getting old already. Thing is that even if you write 2nd - 3rd post in the whole internet, others grab your information and make it less valuable, unlike some bloggers they change the time stamps and claim they released the news before someone else. 

Thank you appreciate the comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@app: I totally agree with you App. Thing is that capcha is used for spam commentators yet the once they want you to login I am there with  you. Why would I have to login, go to my email, click on activation key , login again , search for the post I originaly wanted to comment on&#8230;.</p>
<p>Anyways I do tend to reply to every single comment, yet I do admit that I don&#8217;t make conversational posts as for example Problogger.net does. Technology now days you know for your self that it changes every minute if not second, what you knew minute ago it&#8217;s getting old already. Thing is that even if you write 2nd &#8211; 3rd post in the whole internet, others grab your information and make it less valuable, unlike some bloggers they change the time stamps and claim they released the news before someone else. </p>
<p>Thank you appreciate the comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: app</title>
		<link>http://www.livecrunch.com/2008/09/17/why-dont-you-comment-mashable/comment-page-1/#comment-20313</link>
		<dc:creator>app</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 17:39:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livecrunch.com/?p=956#comment-20313</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t hesitate to leave a comment wherever the urge to comment hits, unless the blog owner makes me jump though hoops by requiring me to make an account just to comment on his blog...or something like a broken comment form or screwball captcha that doesn&#039;t think 4+3=7, insults my intelligence and sucks my comment into a black hole. In that case it&#039;s not likely I&#039;ll ever attempt to comment on that blog, again.

Now, where does the urge hit? Where there is content that provokes thought, where there is evidence of intelligent human life that would appreciate the interaction and would understand the value of my 2 cents, and where there is evidence that the author is reading what commentors say and responds to it. I&#039;ll communicate where I think communication is possible.

Sites like Mashable, Boing Boing, Neatorama, etc...they are not thought provoking blogs. Actually, I don&#039;t consider them blogs at all. They are more like road maps and signs that point the direction to where the real content is. It is at those other sites that I am more likely to comment. After all, I don&#039;t talk to road signs or maps...I talk to humans with a brain &amp; thoughts of their own.

So if you want comments from me (and people like me), express yourself and add something valuable to the internet. Show you have a brain &amp; thoughts of your own. It&#039;s ok to link to other sites that have something interesting, but tell me why you think I should pay attention to it and what your thoughts and feelings were about it. And respond to comments you receive to show you care about communicating with your readers.

Talk to me like a human and not point like a road sign.

I think if you remember that, then if you ever get to be as big as those A-list road sign &quot;blogs&quot;, you won&#039;t have a problem with comments. Written like it&#039;s coming from a human, your content will draw people in and force comments out of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t hesitate to leave a comment wherever the urge to comment hits, unless the blog owner makes me jump though hoops by requiring me to make an account just to comment on his blog&#8230;or something like a broken comment form or screwball captcha that doesn&#8217;t think 4+3=7, insults my intelligence and sucks my comment into a black hole. In that case it&#8217;s not likely I&#8217;ll ever attempt to comment on that blog, again.</p>
<p>Now, where does the urge hit? Where there is content that provokes thought, where there is evidence of intelligent human life that would appreciate the interaction and would understand the value of my 2 cents, and where there is evidence that the author is reading what commentors say and responds to it. I&#8217;ll communicate where I think communication is possible.</p>
<p>Sites like Mashable, Boing Boing, Neatorama, etc&#8230;they are not thought provoking blogs. Actually, I don&#8217;t consider them blogs at all. They are more like road maps and signs that point the direction to where the real content is. It is at those other sites that I am more likely to comment. After all, I don&#8217;t talk to road signs or maps&#8230;I talk to humans with a brain &amp; thoughts of their own.</p>
<p>So if you want comments from me (and people like me), express yourself and add something valuable to the internet. Show you have a brain &amp; thoughts of your own. It&#8217;s ok to link to other sites that have something interesting, but tell me why you think I should pay attention to it and what your thoughts and feelings were about it. And respond to comments you receive to show you care about communicating with your readers.</p>
<p>Talk to me like a human and not point like a road sign.</p>
<p>I think if you remember that, then if you ever get to be as big as those A-list road sign &#8220;blogs&#8221;, you won&#8217;t have a problem with comments. Written like it&#8217;s coming from a human, your content will draw people in and force comments out of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sangeeth</title>
		<link>http://www.livecrunch.com/2008/09/17/why-dont-you-comment-mashable/comment-page-1/#comment-20311</link>
		<dc:creator>sangeeth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 16:46:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livecrunch.com/?p=956#comment-20311</guid>
		<description>very keen observation. Even i wud like to know the reason. This happens not only to big sites but also upcomming ones too. You might expect a lot of comments for a particular post u think is great but u end up having 1 or 2 which some time sucks..anyways..good topic to be discussed on...I am digging it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very keen observation. Even i wud like to know the reason. This happens not only to big sites but also upcomming ones too. You might expect a lot of comments for a particular post u think is great but u end up having 1 or 2 which some time sucks..anyways..good topic to be discussed on&#8230;I am digging it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neal "thePuck" Jansons</title>
		<link>http://www.livecrunch.com/2008/09/17/why-dont-you-comment-mashable/comment-page-1/#comment-20310</link>
		<dc:creator>Neal "thePuck" Jansons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 16:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livecrunch.com/?p=956#comment-20310</guid>
		<description>Generally because Mashable has been going downhill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Generally because Mashable has been going downhill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim Woodbridge</title>
		<link>http://www.livecrunch.com/2008/09/17/why-dont-you-comment-mashable/comment-page-1/#comment-20309</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim Woodbridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 16:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livecrunch.com/?p=956#comment-20309</guid>
		<description>While they do provide some useful information with press releases and their top whatever lists there isn&#039;t much to say other than &quot;ok, thanks&quot;.  I also don&#039;t think it&#039;s a very inviting &quot;community&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While they do provide some useful information with press releases and their top whatever lists there isn&#8217;t much to say other than &#8220;ok, thanks&#8221;.  I also don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s a very inviting &#8220;community&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: live crunch</title>
		<link>http://www.livecrunch.com/2008/09/17/why-dont-you-comment-mashable/comment-page-1/#comment-20307</link>
		<dc:creator>live crunch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 16:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livecrunch.com/?p=956#comment-20307</guid>
		<description>@Geoff: LoL. Thanks tho! I tend to write a bit different then others, yet not at all times but most of the days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Geoff: LoL. Thanks tho! I tend to write a bit different then others, yet not at all times but most of the days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoff</title>
		<link>http://www.livecrunch.com/2008/09/17/why-dont-you-comment-mashable/comment-page-1/#comment-20306</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 16:17:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livecrunch.com/?p=956#comment-20306</guid>
		<description>TechCrunch + Mashable + most other blogs of that ilk  resulted in waaaaay too much duplication in my reader. Dumped pretty much except Arrington. LiveCrunch is still in my reader just because of posts like this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TechCrunch + Mashable + most other blogs of that ilk  resulted in waaaaay too much duplication in my reader. Dumped pretty much except Arrington. LiveCrunch is still in my reader just because of posts like this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: live crunch</title>
		<link>http://www.livecrunch.com/2008/09/17/why-dont-you-comment-mashable/comment-page-1/#comment-20305</link>
		<dc:creator>live crunch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 15:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livecrunch.com/?p=956#comment-20305</guid>
		<description>@Patrick Sweeney: I give you the point that they really don&#039;t break any news well they do sometimes but not as often as others do. Yet If you look at the technology blogs, they consist of same thing Mashable does, one posts article other re-writes it and the list goes on. I admit I do it too yet for my readers and visitors. Only thing I broke as good news was the ipod touch upgrade lol. Anyways I think its something else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Patrick Sweeney: I give you the point that they really don&#8217;t break any news well they do sometimes but not as often as others do. Yet If you look at the technology blogs, they consist of same thing Mashable does, one posts article other re-writes it and the list goes on. I admit I do it too yet for my readers and visitors. Only thing I broke as good news was the ipod touch upgrade lol. Anyways I think its something else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sue</title>
		<link>http://www.livecrunch.com/2008/09/17/why-dont-you-comment-mashable/comment-page-1/#comment-20304</link>
		<dc:creator>Sue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 15:44:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livecrunch.com/?p=956#comment-20304</guid>
		<description>That is kind of what I was thinking, people comment on original content more often then replayed information, maybe its to many people coming across the information elsewhere first?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is kind of what I was thinking, people comment on original content more often then replayed information, maybe its to many people coming across the information elsewhere first?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Sweeney</title>
		<link>http://www.livecrunch.com/2008/09/17/why-dont-you-comment-mashable/comment-page-1/#comment-20303</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Sweeney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 15:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livecrunch.com/?p=956#comment-20303</guid>
		<description>Interesting observation......you would think with all the roundups and top ten lists they have over there would create a lot of ticked off people :)

I&#039;ve never commented on Mashable, and they only reason I can think of is that they have plenty of great content, but they don&#039;t really break any big news.......just a guess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting observation&#8230;&#8230;you would think with all the roundups and top ten lists they have over there would create a lot of ticked off people <img src='http://www.livecrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve never commented on Mashable, and they only reason I can think of is that they have plenty of great content, but they don&#8217;t really break any big news&#8230;&#8230;.just a guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Han</title>
		<link>http://www.livecrunch.com/2008/09/17/why-dont-you-comment-mashable/comment-page-1/#comment-20302</link>
		<dc:creator>Han</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 15:28:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livecrunch.com/?p=956#comment-20302</guid>
		<description>threaded comments? a more friendly layout? nice community - who knows! I think mashable to me looks mre childish? if thats the right word!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>threaded comments? a more friendly layout? nice community &#8211; who knows! I think mashable to me looks mre childish? if thats the right word!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Olivia Bell</title>
		<link>http://www.livecrunch.com/2008/09/17/why-dont-you-comment-mashable/comment-page-1/#comment-20301</link>
		<dc:creator>Olivia Bell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 15:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livecrunch.com/?p=956#comment-20301</guid>
		<description>Maybe they don&#039;t feel their opinion, thoughts, words are listened to. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe they don&#8217;t feel their opinion, thoughts, words are listened to. <img src='http://www.livecrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->