Comments on: Diggers vs Stumbleuponers Traffic http://www.livecrunch.com/2008/09/04/diggers-vs-stumbleuponers-traffic/ Your Daily Techology News, Tutorials and How To's Fri, 30 Oct 2009 10:29:48 -0700 hourly 1 By: live crunch http://www.livecrunch.com/2008/09/04/diggers-vs-stumbleuponers-traffic/comment-page-1/#comment-19858 live crunch Fri, 05 Sep 2008 16:16:59 +0000 http://www.livecrunch.com/?p=916#comment-19858 @Adam: Thanks for your replay. @Adam: Thanks for your replay.

]]> By: Adam http://www.livecrunch.com/2008/09/04/diggers-vs-stumbleuponers-traffic/comment-page-1/#comment-19857 Adam Fri, 05 Sep 2008 16:11:37 +0000 http://www.livecrunch.com/?p=916#comment-19857 In my experiance, I get more traffic from stumble, but it's not sticky. I also get less comments from stumblers. I was a stumbler long before I started a website and I know from my own habits that if I'm stumbling, its because I'm bored. If the site doesn't immediately peak my interest, I'm on to the next one. Digg however seems more community based and people who go to you're site based on recommendations from friends in their friends list, seem more invested. Adam www.twilightearth.com In my experiance, I get more traffic from stumble, but it’s not sticky. I also get less comments from stumblers.

I was a stumbler long before I started a website and I know from my own habits that if I’m stumbling, its because I’m bored. If the site doesn’t immediately peak my interest, I’m on to the next one. Digg however seems more community based and people who go to you’re site based on recommendations from friends in their friends list, seem more invested.

Adam
http://www.twilightearth.com

]]>