<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Top Level Domains &#8211; ICANN</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.livecrunch.com/2008/06/26/new-top-level-domains-icann/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.livecrunch.com/2008/06/26/new-top-level-domains-icann/</link>
	<description>Your Daily Techology News, Tutorials and How To&#039;s</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 10:29:48 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Samster I Amster</title>
		<link>http://www.livecrunch.com/2008/06/26/new-top-level-domains-icann/comment-page-1/#comment-11571</link>
		<dc:creator>Samster I Amster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 01:39:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livecrunch.com/?p=618#comment-11571</guid>
		<description>I saw this mentioned on http://www.SubliminalMessages.Com and think ICANN has made a horendous mistake.  Terrible.  Foolish.  Painfully wrong!

What I think will now happen is ...nothing.  Absolutely nada.

Sure, some suckers will waste their money buying .Bullcrap, but they will choke on it as a bad investment.  Just like no one wanted .aero, .travel., .museum., or .coop, no one will want .peanut, .butter or .jelly.

Bottom line, no change whatsoever and now ICANN is totally out of ammunition.  Bad move.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw this mentioned on <a href="http://www.SubliminalMessages.Com" rel="nofollow">http://www.SubliminalMessages.Com</a> and think ICANN has made a horendous mistake.  Terrible.  Foolish.  Painfully wrong!</p>
<p>What I think will now happen is &#8230;nothing.  Absolutely nada.</p>
<p>Sure, some suckers will waste their money buying .Bullcrap, but they will choke on it as a bad investment.  Just like no one wanted .aero, .travel., .museum., or .coop, no one will want .peanut, .butter or .jelly.</p>
<p>Bottom line, no change whatsoever and now ICANN is totally out of ammunition.  Bad move.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: live crunch</title>
		<link>http://www.livecrunch.com/2008/06/26/new-top-level-domains-icann/comment-page-1/#comment-11569</link>
		<dc:creator>live crunch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 23:35:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livecrunch.com/?p=618#comment-11569</guid>
		<description>@Tom - StandOutBlogger.com: Industry wants more money from domains. Also top level domains got very expensive I just sold Hawaiib.com for 170 yet I spent only 5$</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Tom &#8211; StandOutBlogger.com: Industry wants more money from domains. Also top level domains got very expensive I just sold Hawaiib.com for 170 yet I spent only 5$</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom - StandOutBlogger.com</title>
		<link>http://www.livecrunch.com/2008/06/26/new-top-level-domains-icann/comment-page-1/#comment-11559</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom - StandOutBlogger.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 21:04:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livecrunch.com/?p=618#comment-11559</guid>
		<description>I think all these extra extensions are confusing. Why couldnt they just keep it at .com. org. .net ?

Life was simple in those days :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think all these extra extensions are confusing. Why couldnt they just keep it at .com. org. .net ?</p>
<p>Life was simple in those days <img src='http://www.livecrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->